146 replies to this topic

[Snaggletooth]

Eh......Scott, that video was 8.13 minutes - not 6. May have to edit.

Regards

Janty

[Phil A]

MacCumhail, on 31 January 2012 - 12:52 PM, said:

Phil A, on 31 January 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:

Just a quick note to say this thread is "on the radar", and to ask people to make sure it stays civil.
There's not been anything yet that would warrant any moderation, so lets keep it that way

So you are warning everyone not to do what they haven't done?

If you want to put it like that, yes

It was a gentle reminder to people to keep things civil on a thread that was starting to show the hallmarks of one that may run out of control...

[easystreet]

hey, if it hasn't gone totally south by 8 pages, it's over the hump

[love2vape]

Much ado about nothing I think...

[Vapist]

easystreet, on 26 January 2012 - 10:29 PM, said:

now we'll never know if it produces a really nice amount of vapour!

I think that one is a given easy...every review I've seen has the immortal words "as you can see, it produces a really nice amount of vapour" lol

[Vapist]

Maybe Scott should have done a review and just to change things up from the usual a little it could have gone like so;

"hi my name is Scott and today I'm going to be doing a reicew on the janty neo classic. Before I start I'd like to point out that I received the product free of charge for the purpose of making a promotional video for janty and my opinions have been influenced by the demands of janty and are not true honest and accurate as normal.....now I've only got 5 minuets left of reviewing time so let's not see what you get in the box and lets see what it vapes like"....•puff puff• (no o rings.. No time for that). "as you can see it produces a really nice amout of vapour, you can buy them from jantyworld, cheers guys, thanks for watching...happy vaping"

Now that would have been funny!

[Maff]

So am I right in thinking, Janty haven't said anything publicly about their review 'stipulations' yet?